If you’re looking for the Top 8 alternatives to LinkedPhone for a business telephony This comparison has been designed with you in mind. It’s aimed at sales teams and in-house call centers who want to compare solutions based on actual use in the field, not just on data sheets. The aim is simple: to help you make a coherent B2B choice based on your context, constraints and operational priorities.
No credit card
No obligation
Custom demo
The solutions below have been compared in terms of their suitability for real-world use in corporate telephony, for sales teams and in-house call centers.
| Solution | Best for | Key features | Price positioning | Score out of 10 |
| Kavkom | Performance-oriented sales teams and in-house call centers | Predictive dialer, real-time supervision, CRM integration, operational reporting | Flexible, no-commitment subscription, clear logic by usage | 8,5 |
| RingCentral | Structured companies with multi-channel and IT needs | Advanced routing, omnichannel contact center, analytics, collaboration | Packaged offers per user, advanced options in higher ranges | 7,5 |
| Mitel | Organizations with complex or hybrid telecom environments | IP telephony, infrastructure management, supervision, network reliability | Project and license-oriented model, more complex costs | 6,5 |
| Twilio | Technical teams and products requiring customization | Voice APIs, automations, scalability, technical integrations | Usage-based billing, variable costs according to volume | 6 |
| Plivo | Voice API developers and technical teams | Call and SMS APIs, automation, international coverage | Easy-to-understand but technical consumer model | 6 |
| Vonage | SMEs and SMBs looking for a versatile UCaaS solution | Cloud telephony, contact center, CRM integrations, reporting | Per-user subscriptions with modular options | 7 |
| Dialpad | Collaborative teams with AI usage | AI transcription, supervision, cloud telephony, analytics | Subscriptions per user, AI options in higher plans | 7 |
Kavkom stands out for its approach focused on corporate telephony and real-life use by sales teams and internal call centers, with simple implementation, clear cost logic and flexibility adapted to demanding B2B contexts.
Kavkom is designed for companies that want enterprise telephonydesigned for sales teams and in-house call centers. Typically, a sales team who need to call, track and manage their business without piling up tools.
Features are field-oriented, so you can work faster and maintain visibility on a day-to-day basis.
The logic is simple and straightforward, with a solution 100% cloud, hardware-free, with no commitment and prorated billing. The tool easily grows with the size of the team, without any breaks or complex projects.
Kavkom makes a choice of specialization on sales performance and internal team management. It offers an open REST API for specific integrations, but is not positioned as a raw, developer-oriented telecom brick. Organizations looking for a very broad omnichannel platform, or one that is ultra-customized by development, may prefer other approaches.
8,5 / 10
Kavkom meets all the criteria in the table: real use, rapid implementation, management of sales teams and internal call centers, with contractual flexibility that is rare in demanding B2B contexts.
Ringover is ideal for SMEs and SMBs who want a central centralized communication platformwith a strong focus on customer relations and sales productivity.
The model is based on per-user subscriptionswith features that are moving upmarket. Readability is good, but annual commitment is frequent to optimize costs.
For teams looking for maximum contractual flexibility or a very simple start-up, the pricing structure seems more rigid.
7,5 / 10
Aircall targets fast-growing sales and support teams fast-growingwho want to deploy cloud telephony without heavy IT dependency.
Pricing is per useroften with commitment. Costs increase with team size and access to advanced functions.
Less suited to contexts requiring a very high level of customization or a very detailed pro rata cost logic.
7 / 10
Dialpad is designed for teams who want a unified unified platform with a strong AI layer, combining calls and collaboration.
Offers are structured by user, with AI options often reserved on the top level. The logic is clear, but quickly becomes more complex.
For use with a strong focus on prospecting and sales management, the approach may seem more general than necessary.
7 / 10
CloudTalk is ideal for international sales and support teams handling large, distributed call volumes.
The model is per userwith functional levels. Legibility is good, but some key functions require higher levels.
Less relevant for teams looking for very simple implementation or ultra-flexible contractual logic.
7 / 10
JustCall is designed for sales and support teams who want to centralize calls and messages in an omnichannel logic.
Pricing per user is progressive, with options depending on the channels used. The structure is easy to understand.
For organizations focused on fine-tuned control and real-time supervision, the tool seems less specialized.
7 / 10
RingCentral targets larger companies with broad communication and collaboration needs.
Offers are structured and often engaging, with a gradual move upmarket depending on usage.
Complexity and functional scope can exceed the needs of more agile sales teams.
7 / 10
Grasshopper is especially aimed at freelancers and small businesses who want a professional numberwithout call center logic.
The model is simple and easy to read, with few parameters and quick set-up.
Not suitable for structured sales teams or in-house call centers requiring supervision and control.
5,5 / 10
Start by identifying who will be using the solution on a daily basis.
Volume changes the experience.
Ask yourself the question of piloting.
Take a look at cost transparency over time.
Finally, assess your need for flexibility.
Kavkom and LinkedPhone do not respond to the same logic of use. The right choice depends above all on the role telephony really plays in your organization.
Is your telephony a simple contact tool or a daily operational lever?
If you’re primarily looking for a business number that’s easy to manage, LinkedPhone may suffice. As soon as calls become a mainstay of sales activity or an in-house call center, a more management-oriented approach makes sense, like the one offered by Kavkom.
Do you need to monitor and supervise team activity in real time?
For individual use or use with little supervision, LinkedPhone remains consistent. However, when it comes to manage callsWhen it comes to managing calls, supporting teams and maintaining operational visibility, a solution designed for this purpose is more appropriate.
Are you looking for a turnkey solution, or are you comfortable with regular adjustments?
LinkedPhone is well suited to simple, stable needs. An evolving organization, with clear business objectives, will benefit from a solution designed to adapt without complexity.
Is contractual flexibility important to your business?
If your user or call volume varies, the ability to easily adjust the solution becomes a real criterion, over and above functionality.
Do your teams work under pressure with volume or performance targets?
In this case, the tool needs to support the day-to-day rhythm and management, not just ensure that calls are received or sent.
In short, LinkedPhone is well suited to simple, unstructured uses. Kavkom appears to be a coherent choice for teams who use telephony as a means of communication. performance tool and day-to-day management, particularly on the sales side.
Find out why over 8,000 companies work with Kavkom for their corporate telephony.
4.7 on Capterra
With Kavkom, I was able to easily resolve the issue of communication costs to my regular customers. My agents, too, were no longer restricted in their mobility, because even when on the move, communications are managed.
Ben Cauchois
VP Sales & Operations @ SEIZA
We’ve increased our targets by 10% thanks to the information we’ve gained from call identification and analysis provided by Kavkom’s telephony solution.
Dov Dahan
CEO @ Formideo
We evaluated several service providers, and Kavkom emerged as the only option that allowed us to tailor our customer service requirements to our unique business practices.
Pierre Roche
Managing Partner
at Groupe OREL
The integration of Kavkom’s virtual number service with voicemail has considerably facilitated our process of collecting visitor testimonials. We have been able to gather valuable feedback that helps us to continually improve our services.
Hélène Lafont-Couturier
Visitor Relations Manager
Musée des Confluences
Any other questions?
Consult our Online Help or Contact us
Which alternative to LinkedPhone is best for B2B companies?
Above all, it depends on the actual use of telephony within the company. A B2B structure with teams organized around calls, follow-up and management does not have the same needs as a small organization with occasional use. The right choice depends on the role of calls in day-to-day business.
Which alternatives are best suited to sales teams?
Sales teams need outbound calls, business visibility and a minimum of supervision. Some solutions, like Kavkom, are designed to turn telephony into an operational lever, while others remain focused on simple communication. What’s important is the ability to support day-to-day performance.
Are these alternatives suitable for call centers?
Yes, but only in the context of internal call centers to the company. In this case, the needs are for control, real-time monitoring and team organization. Not all solutions offer the same level of supervision, or the same ease of implementation.
Are there any commitment-free alternatives to LinkedPhone?
Some solutions offer greater contractual flexibility than others. This criterion becomes important when the business is changing rapidly or the workforce is fluctuating. The ability to adjust the tool without heavy constraints can weigh heavily in the decision.
How do you compare the real costs of these alternatives?
We need to look beyond the initial subscription. The options required for actual use, the scalability of the teams and the legibility of the model over time are decisive. A simple solution can become more complex as business grows.
