If you’re looking for the Top 6 alternatives to Flexip for enterprise telephony that’s truly adapted to your sales teams or in-house call centers, this comparison is designed for you. It analyzes solutions based on actual use in the field, not on promises or lists of features. The aim is simple: to help you make a B2B choice that’s consistent with your context, your constraints and the way you work every day.
No credit card
No obligation
Custom demo
The solutions below were compared on the basis of their suitability for real-life business telephony applications, team productivity and cost flexibility.
| Solution | Best for | Key features | Price positioning | Score out of 10 |
| Kavkom | Performance-oriented sales teams and in-house call centers | Predictive dialer, real-time supervision, CRM integration, operational reporting | No commitment, pro rata billing, simple logic | 8,8 |
| RingCentral | Multi-site companies with unified communications needs | Cloud telephony, video conferencing, analytics, business integrations | Subscriptions per user, modular options | 8,2 |
| Mitel | Structured IT organizations with existing infrastructures | Enterprise telephony, advanced routing, supervision, network reliability | More rigid model, infrastructure-related costs | 7,4 |
| Twilio | Technical teams with programmable communication needs | Voice APIs, SMS, automation, advanced personalization | Pay-per-use billing, variable costs according to volume | 7,2 |
| Plivo | Developers and customized telephony projects | Voice and SMS APIs, routing, monitoring | Pay-per-use, technical management | 7,0 |
| Vonage | SMBs looking for versatile cloud telephony | VoIP telephony, IVR, CRM integrations, reporting | Subscriptions per user, additional options | 7,6 |
| Dialpad | Collaboration-oriented sales and support teams | Cloud telephony, conversational AI, analytics, integrations | Subscriptions per user, features per plan | 7,8 |
Unlike Twilio or Plivo, which are technical building blocks designed for developers, Kavkom is a turnkey turnkey operational platformdesigned for business teams (sales, in-house call centers), with no development required, simple implementation, flexible logic and key functionalities adapted to sales teams and in-house call centers.
Kavkom is ideal for companies managing sales teams or in-house in-house call centerswith a clear need for operational management. Typically, a sales team that calls every day needs to monitor activity in real time and quickly adjust its organization.
Kavkom focuses on the key features key functionalities required for standard commercial usewith no essential modules to add to get you started.
These elements respond to concrete situations in the field, not theoretical cases.
Unlike most solutions on the market, Kavkom operates on a no-commitment basis, with prorated billing and instant activation/termination. This makes it easy to adjust headcount or usage without contractual rigidity.
Kavkom makes a business performance-oriented choice of specialization. It offers an open REST API for specific integrations, but is not positioned as a developer-oriented raw telecom infrastructure solution, unlike Twilio or Plivo.
8,8 / 10
Kavkom clearly aligns corporate telephony, real-life use and flexibilityThis makes it a coherent option for sales teams and in-house call centers who want to get straight to the point, without unnecessary complexity.
Ringover is primarily aimed at SMEs and SMBs looking for a solution focused on customer relations and sales performanceThe focus is on omnichannel. For example, a sales team that alternates calls, messages and CRM follow-up.
The approach is broad and covers many channels, which can be useful in multi-tool contexts.
Ringover is based on per-user subscriptionswith different levels of functionality depending on the plan. The logic is clear, but less flexible for frequent variations in headcount.
The wealth of functions can become less legible for teams who are above all looking for simple, highly operational telephony. simple, highly operational telephonywithout an omnichannel layer.
8,0 / 10
Aircall is ideal for the sales and support teams of growing SMEs, who want a solution that can be rapidly deployed and well integrated with their business tools.
These functions facilitate collaborative working and daily call follow-up.
The model is based on per-user subscriptionsoften associated with annual commitments. The clarity is good, but flexibility remains limited in the long term.
For very high call volumes or very fine control requirements, the solution may show its limits without upgrading.
7,8 / 10
LinkedPhone targets solopreneurs, VSEs and small teamswho want a business number easy to manage, often on the move.
Easy to use for simple, unstructured needs.
Pricing is simple and non-bindingdesigned to remain affordable for small businesses.
As teams grow or the need for advanced advanced supervision LinkedPhone becomes less suitable.
6,9 / 10
CloudTalk is ideal for SMEs or growing companies with distributed sales or support teams, often based abroad.
The solution is focused on management and performanceparticularly for large call volumes.
The model is based on scalable subscriptionswith advanced features available on higher levels.
Getting to grips with it can be more complex for small teams who don’t need advanced functions.
7,6 / 10
JustCall is designed for sales and support teams looking for an omnichannel approach. omnichannel approach and automation, often in international contexts.
These tools facilitate multi-channel tracking and productivity.
Pricing is structured by plans and userswith gradual upgrading according to need.
For teams focused solely on pure enterprise telephonythe omnichannel approach can add unnecessary complexity.
7,5 / 10
Start by identifying who really uses telephony on a daily basis.
Volume has a major influence on choice.
Ask yourself the question of piloting.
Beyond the overall budget, look above all at the cost transparency.
The flexibility is often decisive.
These two solutions do not meet the same expectations. The choice depends on your organizationyour the place of telephony in your business and the way your teams work on a daily basis.
Is your telephony a simple tool or an operational lever?
If calls are at the heart of your business, with volume or performance objectives, you’ll need a solution designed to keep pace. Conversely, more occasional use may be satisfied with a more basic framework.
Do you need to manage calls and teams in real time?
Some organizations focus on making and receiving calls. Others need to monitor activity on an ongoing basis, adjusting priorities and supporting teams as the day progresses. The level of control required makes a big difference to the decision.
Do you prefer a turnkey solution or a more structured environment?
If you want to get started quickly, without complexity, a real-world approach is often more comfortable. More technical or highly specific contexts may require a heavier implementation.
Is contractual flexibility important to you?
When staff numbers change, or business activity fluctuates, the ability to adjust usage simply becomes a central criterion. In more stable organizations, this point may be secondary.
Do your teams work under pressure with clear objectives?
Sales teams and in-house call centers often need a framework that supports day-to-day performance, without unnecessary friction.
In short, the right choice depends less on the solution itself than on the the actual use you will make of it. Kavkom is a coherent option for teams who want corporate telephony aligned with their operational rhythm, their need for management and their quest for flexibility.
Find out why over 8,000 companies work with Kavkom for their corporate telephony.
4.7 on Capterra
With Kavkom, I was able to easily resolve the issue of communication costs to my regular customers. My agents, too, were no longer restricted in their mobility, because even when on the move, communications are managed.
Ben Cauchois
VP Sales & Operations @ SEIZA
We’ve increased our targets by 10% thanks to the information we’ve gained from call identification and analysis provided by Kavkom’s telephony solution.
Dov Dahan
CEO @ Formideo
We evaluated several service providers, and Kavkom emerged as the only option that allowed us to tailor our customer service requirements to our unique business practices.
Pierre Roche
Managing Partner
at Groupe OREL
The integration of Kavkom’s virtual number service with voicemail has considerably facilitated our process of collecting visitor testimonials. We have been able to gather valuable feedback that helps us to continually improve our services.
Hélène Lafont-Couturier
Visitor Relations Manager
Musée des Confluences
Any other questions?
Consult our Online Help or Contact us
Which Flexip alternative is best suited to B2B companies?
There is no single answer. The right choice depends on team typeSome solutions are suitable for one-off use, while others are designed for telephony used as a daily operational tool. Some solutions are suitable for one-off use, while others are designed for telephony used as a day-to-day operational tool. It’s this real-life context that must guide the decision.
Which alternatives are most appropriate for sales teams?
Above all, sales teams need smooth outgoing calls, a clear activity follow-up and supervision tools. Performance-oriented solutions make it easier to manage, prioritize and achieve objectives. Other, more generalist platforms may lack the clarity needed for these specific uses.
Are these alternatives suitable for in-house call centers?
Yes, but not all in the same way. A in-house call center involves managing volumes, queues and managerial follow-up. Adapted solutions offer a structured framework for organizing team work, while others are limited to more individual or one-off use.
Are there any alternatives to Flexip without commitment?
Some solutions focus on contractual flexibilityOthers are based on longer-term commitments, better suited to stable organizations. Others are based on longer-term commitments, better suited to stable organizations. This criterion becomes key when staff numbers or call volumes vary regularly.
How do you compare the real costs of Flexip alternatives?
We need to look beyond the initial offer. Visit business modelIt often makes a difference what options are needed for actual use, and how costs evolve with growth. A solution may seem simple at first, but become less legible as needs grow.
