If you’re looking for alternatives to Ringover for enterprise telephony that’s truly tailored to your sales teams or in-house call centers, this comparison is just what you need. This Top 8 alternatives to Ringover analyzes solutions according to real-world usage, to help you make an informed B2B choice, based on your context and operational priorities.
No credit card
No obligation
Custom demo
The solutions below have been compared in terms of their suitability for real-world use in corporate telephony, for sales teams and in-house call centers.
| Solution | Best for | Key features | Price positioning | Score out of 10 |
| Kavkom | Performance-oriented sales teams and in-house call centers | Predictive dialer, real-time supervision, CRM integration, operational reporting | Flexible, no-commitment subscription, clear logic by usage | 8,7 |
| RingCentral | Structured companies with extensive multi-channel needs | Advanced routing, contact center, analytics, broad integrations | Modular offerings, progressive upgrading | 7,9 |
| Mitel | Organizations with IT constraints and hybrid telephony | Supervision, IVR, reporting, deployment options | License and project-oriented model | 7,3 |
| Twilio | Technical teams building customized workflows | Voice APIs, automations, customized integrations | Usage-based billing, variable costs | 7,0 |
| Plivo | Programmatic VoIP projects with controlled volumes | Voice APIs, SMS, routing, monitoring | Pay-per-use, developer logic | 6,8 |
| Vonage | SMBs looking for a standardized VoIP solution | Routing, recording, analytics, CRM integrations | Tiered subscriptions, additional options | 7,2 |
| Dialpad | Teams seeking automation and AI support | AI transcription, coaching, supervision, integrations | Per-user plans, advanced options | 7,6 |
Kavkom is a business telephony-oriented alternative, designed for real-life use by sales teams and in-house call centers, with simple implementation and contractual flexibility tailored to operational needs.
Kavkom is ideal for companies that manage sales teams or in-house in-house call centersWith a clear need for easy-to-use business telephony. Typically, a sales team that calls prospects every day, tracks performance and wants to keep a clear view of the business without technical complexity.
Kavkom natively integrates RGPD security and compliance requirements: call encryption, fine-grained rights management, secure hosting.
Features are designed for everyday operational use, with no superfluous modules to activate to get started.
The model is based on a flexible subscription logicThis is a no-commitment solution, with billing based on actual team usage. Costs remain transparent as the team grows, with no need to pile on essential bricks.
Kavkom makes a choice of specialization on business performance-oriented telephony. Organizations looking for a very broad collaboration suite or very specific product uses will need to check the functional suitability.
8,7 / 10
Kavkom stands out for its ability to meet the specific needs of sales teams and in-house call centers, with turnkey cloud telephony that focuses on real-life usage, supervision and contractual flexibility.
Aircall is primarily aimed at SMEs and growing support or sales teams who want to centralize calls and collaborate easily. For example, a customer service department structured around a helpdesk with several agents.
The solution focuses on collaboration and collective visibility.
Aircall works on a subscription per userwith a logic geared more towards established teams. Scaling up is done in stages, which can make the bill heavier for larger teams.
For teams that are highly oriented towards intensive outbound calls, or looking for a high degree of contractual flexibility, Aircall can lack flexibility over time.
7,8 / 10
Dialpad is ideal for companies that want to combine telephony and artificial intelligence-assisted toolsThis is often the case for sales or support teams already at ease with advanced digital environments.
Everyday use is strongly influenced by automation.
Pricing is based on plans per userwith advanced options that can be activated as required. Readability remains good, but some useful bricks require higher formulas.
Dialpad may be less suitable for teams looking for a very simple solution, with no AI layer, or for those who prefer contractual flexibility above all else.
7,6 / 10
CloudTalk is designed for SMEs and growing businesses with regular call volumes, often spread over several several markets. For example, an international sales or support team that wants to centralize its calls without relying on a complex infrastructure.
The solution is designed to structure day-to-day telephone activity.
CloudTalk operates on a per-user subscription logicwith options to suit the level of analysis or automation required. Scalability is gradual, but can become more costly with advanced requirements.
For teams focused on intensive prospecting or looking for extreme contractual simplicity, the solution may seem more cumbersome to set up.
7,5 / 10
JustCall is ideal for sales and support teams who want to centralize calls and messages in a single tool. A common case is that of a start-up or SME managing sales and customer relations with multi-skilled staff.
Field use is based on centralized exchanges.
The model is based on per-user subscriptionswith different levels to suit different needs. The structure is easy to read, but some useful functions require higher levels.
For more structured in-house call centers or highly specialized teams, JustCall may have its limits in terms of advanced supervision.
7,4 / 10
LinkedPhone is mainly aimed at freelancers, small teams or very small businesses who want a business number that’s easy to manage. For example, a small sales team looking to separate business and personal calls.
The solution is all about simplicity.
LinkedPhone adopts a simple subscription logicA no-commitment, easy-to-understand solution for small structures. Growth is still possible, but with limited functionality.
For larger sales teams or in-house call centers with advanced supervision requirements, the tool quickly becomes insufficient.
6,8 / 10
RingCentral is especially relevant for companies that are already well structured, with large teams and wide-ranging communication needs. Typically, a multi-department organization looking to unify voice and collaboration.
Use is based on a comprehensive platform.
Pricing follows a modular logicwith functional tiers. The offer is powerful, but the clarity of costs can diminish as needs become more complex.
For sales teams looking for a solution focused on calls and operations, RingCentral may seem over-dimensioned.
7,2 / 10
CallHippo is ideal for small and medium-sized businesses and teams setting up their first corporate telephony service. A common example is a small sales team that quickly wants local numbers and centralized management.
The tool is designed for quick start-up.
CallHippo is based on a accessible subscription logicwith options that can be activated as required. Flexibility is good for getting started, less so for advanced uses.
Above a certain volume of calls or high supervision requirements, the solution may lack functional depth.
7,0 / 10
A solution designed for sales teams outbound call center does not have the same priorities as an in-house call center or an inbound-oriented support service. Some platforms are versatile, others highly specialized.
Basic use is often limited to tracking calls.
Managerial use involves listening, real-time monitoring and team performance management.
The question is mainly about readability of costs and how they evolve as the team grows or usage intensifies.
Long or short commitment, ease of adding or removing users, simplicity of activation or deactivation: these points have a direct impact on operational risk.
The two solutions do not meet the same expectations, and the right choice depends above all on the place telephony occupies in your organization and the way your teams use it on a daily basis.
Is your telephony a simple tool or an operational lever?
If your calls are mainly used for occasional communication, a general-purpose solution may suffice. On the other hand, when calls structure sales activity or that of an in-house call center, telephony designed for operational use takes on its full meaning.
Do you need to manage calls and teams in real time?
Some organizations are content with basic monitoring. Others need supervision, immediate visibility and fine-tuned management to support their teams in achieving their objectives.
Are you looking for a turnkey solution or a more IT-oriented environment?
When the priority is to go fast, with simple handling and no technical complexity, expectations are not the same as in a context where IT plays a central role in the configuration and evolution of the tool.
Is contractual flexibility important to your business?
In environments where staff numbers and volumes change, the ability to easily adjust usage and commitment becomes a decisive criterion.
Do your teams work under pressure with volume or performance targets?
Sales teams and in-house call centers with daily objectives need a tool that really supports pace and performance, not just communication.
In the end, the most pertinent choice is the one that aligns with your actual usage, your organization and your operational constraints. For teams who see telephony as a structured and controlled daily work tool, Kavkom is a coherent and rational option.
Find out why over 8,000 companies work with Kavkom for their corporate telephony.
4.7 on Capterra
With Kavkom, I was able to easily resolve the issue of communication costs to my regular customers. My agents, too, were no longer restricted in their mobility, because even when on the move, communications are managed.
Ben Cauchois
VP Sales & Operations @ SEIZA
We’ve increased our targets by 10% thanks to the information we’ve gained from call identification and analysis provided by Kavkom’s telephony solution.
Dov Dahan
CEO @ Formideo
We evaluated several service providers, and Kavkom emerged as the only option that allowed us to tailor our customer service requirements to our unique business practices.
Pierre Roche
Managing Partner
at Groupe OREL
The integration of Kavkom’s virtual number service with voicemail has considerably facilitated our process of collecting visitor testimonials. We have been able to gather valuable feedback that helps us to continually improve our services.
Hélène Lafont-Couturier
Visitor Relations Manager
Musée des Confluences
Any other questions?
Consult our Online Help or Contact us
Which Ringover alternative is best for B2B companies?
There is no single answer. The right choice depends above all on your team typeOur solutions are tailored to your needs, depending on the importance of calls in your business and your management requirements. Some solutions are better suited to generalist environments, others to highly operational uses.
Which alternatives are best suited to sales teams?
Sales teams need telephony designed for outgoing calls. outgoing callsactivity monitoring and supervision. Solutions that treat the call as a lever for day-to-day performance are often more appropriate than those focused on general communication.
Are these alternatives suitable for an in-house call center?
Yes, as long as you make a clear distinction between an in-house call center simple customer support. Intensive use requires supervision, real-time visibility and control, which not all solutions offer to the same degree.
Are there more flexible alternatives to Ringover?
Some platforms rely on contractual flexibilityThis flexibility is particularly important in contexts where the business changes frequently. This flexibility is particularly important in contexts where the business changes frequently.
How do you compare the real costs of different alternatives?
We need to look beyond the model on display. Visit necessary optionsThe initial pricing structure is often more important than the ramp-up and evolution of usage over time.
